On Slavery...
Some countries as well practice a slave morality as well as they are resource rich and ripe for exploitation because those who occupy the land are not suitable for positions of a master morality and will let those resources go to waste if they are not appropriated correctly. J. Sakai was just expressing sour grapes in his book about settler colonialism simply because some cultures want to work for their labor, to earn the sweat of their brow, others want free handouts, such as in lower Africa. The African American is very similar in many respects that 'everything permissible thus free" and the welfare class puts many of these folks in a slave morality. Even in the USSR you were required to work to get what you wanted but essentially they are just imitating their forebearers in the idea that "if I beg I will get something in return"
This even extends to governance that if a country is too corrupt to govern itself, it acts as a slave to a master provisional government that would serve the citizens better, such as Chechnya after the Chechen wars to Russia and The Kremlin. To prevent the influx of migration from Mexico to the United States, I would forsee the United States using a similar method to Mexico and making a vassalage out of Mexico since it's apparent we as a people can use a master morality to serve their people better than the government they have in place.
Aristotle's concept showed that some are fit for rule and others for service, and even the Bible shows elements of predestination for people under God.
Ex:
For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth - Romans 9:11
In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will - Ephesians 1:11
That is the word of God showing where people fit in society and will most certainly end up
Comments
Post a Comment