A Supreme Gentleman’s Guide To English Grammar (Somewhat Satirical)

 

    This short essay is meant to show that people who engage with the so-called “incel” community are using language abusively towards men who are not currently able to find their significant other and for starters the word “incel” itself is an outsider word, created by university student only know as “Alana”. This person, whose gender we will devalue in a breakdown of English grammar in the proceeding essay, has cornered many a man who is unable to get sexual relations or find a decent wife or girlfriend. Many men, who undoubtedly use this term as a way of “taking it back” like blacks have done with “nigger”, gays have done with “faggot” and women have done with “cunt” have not actually diffused its incendiary meaning, meaning that the word still holds a poisonous usage in American and British women’s vocabulary. This failure to properly “own” a word has caused intense surveillance of men who otherwise pose no threat to women, even if things such as shootings (likely false flags) were committed in order to further disarm and bring harm to men who just want someone to spend the night with, cuddling by the fireside or going on dates to restaurants or at most, someone to marry and spend their lives with. In the proceeding chapters we will break down English grammar for those men in the Anglophile countries can use to their advantage and a clear rulebook for grammar in the sphere of so-called “incels”

Alright, lets get down to business.

There are certain phrases in the English language which perceive a sense of responsibility towards a man, for instance

“He was late”

“Small penis”

“Midget”

These phrases, which in a contextual setting could be true, however they can be turned around as such:

“She was early”

“Average sized”

“Average height”

We must note that in the second phrase “average sized” denotes that, according to research, large phalluses are common mostly to men who are of the homosexual persuation and cannot be “incel” for the fact men desire sexual relations much more readily. Transference of phrases can be done that 

“Homosexual”

or 

“Female”

Can easily translate to “easy life” or “easy mode” in the usage of such phrases like

“The homosexual man john gets around a lot” to “John lives life on easy mode”

We can also see in the last phrase with synonyms such as “dwarf”, “midget” can be transferred to “average height”, &c however, the first phrase and third phrase do not need context to justify them, proceeding on to the next subject, which denotes different coinages of slang or rudimentary language according to context.

The phrase “she makes a lot of money” can transfer to “thot” as “woman” or “women” is just “foid” and “foids” respectively, as the plural of thot is just “thots”, however using the vulgar tongues of African men might shift terminology so therefore “to think” is “using your intellect” or “intellectualizing” as to seem more sophisticated.

An example:

“I think women should make more money”

Translates to

“I’m intellectualizing about thottery”

Now mind you we’re not talking about ceramic bowls here, but rather the practice of “women”,i.e., “foids” making money translates to “thots” and the practice of a woman making money is “thottery”, denoting an activity, to avoid saying alliterations like “thinking” about “thots”, we add a layer of sophistication using “intellect” or in the active verb sense “intellectualizing” about “women making money” or “thots” for shorthand.

Now on to language that defines people

The sentence “she is intellectual” is a false positive, since foids don’t think, they feel, so saying “she thinks she is intellectual” makes more sense, going further “she feels she is more intellectual” is more in tune with the general zeitgeist of women.

Moving on…

Such phrases that signify questioning male ethics such as

“I think” or “I feel” or “he thinks” or “he feels” should never be used, as in the phrase

“He feels abortion is wrong” can be truncated to just “abortion is wrong” it does not preclude this moral statement needs an addendum at the beginning. But in the cases of phrases such as “he thinks women should be healthy at any size” is a forbidden sentence, as no one can be “healthy” at “any size” especially when uttered by “he” or “him” or “I” or “me” when referring to the self. Such sentences should be avoided at any cost or at least substituted with “soy” as the phrase or “cucked”

When referring to a man who cannot drive we say “transportationally challenged” when its a woman we say “lazy”, such as gendered cases when it comes to phrases like “he is so lazy, he won’t pick me up” is almost a forbidden sentence, as it should at least be truncated to “he is transportationally challenged” as the latter part of the phrase is unneeded, we know he cannot pick you up, so therefore its implied.

In other cases such as “he is fat” or “he is ugly” should proceed that they become “he is big” or “he is average”, as permitting any use towards appearance should tread lightly, but when the genders are reversed:

“She is fat” is fine but “she is healthy at any size” is false because this inherently puts the woman on a pedestal.

“She is average” however can be turned into “she is on easy mode” whereas “she is ugly” remains the same.

The sentence “women are naturally hypergamous” is dangerous, switching with “she is acting unnatural” is better, however “women are naturally antisocial” can even be used, I do not see this as always putting limitations on language but rather adding and subtracting to create a new usage of English.

For instance

“She is rich” can be “she is privileged” or even “she lives on tutorial mode” or “on easy mode” can be used as well, providing a supreme gentleman with a rich vocabulary.

The phrase “I have a car” is fine however when speaking to another man without the ability to drive he is “transportationally challenged”

When we look at some key phrases

“He had a oneitis” can be exchanged for “soy” but not “cuckold” as it does not preclude inferiority towards a woman but the simple fact that “he” who has “a oneits” means he lives in servitude not inferiority. There is a difference in tone depending on how terrible the man’s predisposition is, such as the phase “someone fucked my oneitis” there is no need for profanity, just saying “cucked” or “cuckold” will do.

“He wears lifts” isn’t an example of “compensation” but rather “he is trying to cope” is much more pertinent, as things like “video games”, “movies”, “music” can all be defined by “cope” or “copes” but do not necessarily have to be titled as such.

“Women should lose weight” is factual, yet “he should be taller” is nonfactual, as a man cannot “tall” himself but “weight loss” however the difficulty can be done by foids.

“He is chad” and “he is privileged” and “he is an asshole” mean all the same thing, yet “she is stacy” can be substituted for “she is a thot” and also mean the same thing. So it goes…

One thing that must be stated is that phrases such as “she can do it” do not necessarily have to change, as “do it” can mean anything including getting “dicked down” which is “cucked”, especially if you (as the man) are pining for her, unless you are “dicking her down” which is fine.

The phrase “I escortcelled” can just mean “I had sex” as they mean the same thing, unless its with a man then you “went on easy mode” or rather “I found easy mode” as homosexuals have no problem getting laid, as they are hypersexual and antisocial beings.

In this day and age, unfortunately, foids can do whatever they put their minds to do and its our job to limit their ability to think or “feel” as women do not “think” or “intellectualize” but “feel” all things.

As we “intellectualize” all things. We are supreme gentlemen.

(this was retrieved from a drive that had some writings in it that I'd done)

                                                                                                                    J./Adolf Stalin